Compare this to the TAT, which could present Jack with images of familiar situations, say a child playing in a playground or a person playing the piano while looking excited. The Rorschach test provides images that could be too complicated for Jack to interpret in addition to the fact that Jack could be so overwhelmed by confusion by it that his answers will continue to linger on. She wants to know if this could be a personality issue or at least what it says about Jack. Yes, both tests are used to measure someone’s personality, but let’s assume the following situation takes place: a mother of an 8 year old son named Jack wants to find out what it is about Jack that makes him unable to stay in the classroom, stay at music lessons or stay in the playground while crying out for his mother. One situation I can see using the TAT versus the Rorschach test is when I would want to find out something specific. In this case, interpretation couldn’t be made, and with the help of an experienced psychologist or test examiner, it would be recommended that the TAT be used to find what the Rorschach couldn’t find, or to determine personality characteristics that couldn’t be determined. However, if it is difficult to interpret someone’s personality from the Rorschach already, imagine how difficult it would be if that person simply describes the inkblot and nothing else. We understand that Exner theorized that the Rorschach test is showing its use when a person begins to elaborate on his or her explanation besides just describing basic features of the inkblot seen (Framingham, 2012). What I can say is that since both tests are used to measure personality, perhaps one test can be used when the other proves ineffective. Kaplan and Saccuzzo, 2009) Examples of Use I honestly am having a hard time finding situations or possible scenarios when both the Rorschach and TAT can be used. Other claims about the Rorschach included that it was purely created for clinical use and was a diagnostic tool, while TAT creators saw the test not solely as a diagnostic tool and said it could be for non-clinical uses as well. While the Rorschach gained its popularity in part because of extravagant claims on its utility – which could have been bolstered on its blind analysis component, where the examiner remarkably doesn’t need to know a client’s personal or medical history – creators of the TAT were more conservative about the test as well as being more scientific. Compare this to the Rorschach, which isn’t based on any theory at all. Why? This could be because the TAT is based on Murray’s (1938) theory of needs that includes 28 human needs not limited to affiliation, dominance sex and achievement, which in turn has led to a large number of scientific studies involving the TAT. While the Rorschach has mainly been rejected by the scientific community, the TAT has been more positively received by the scientific community (Kaplan and Saccuzzo, 2009).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |